IMG_2818I recently purchased a new wireless router for home use; the ASUS RT-N66U. The router it replaced was a D=Link DIR-655. I have wanted a simultaneous dual-band router for several years, but until recently had not found one that worked as well as the single-band DIR-655. What finally pushed me over the edge on the ASUS was the need for ‘parental controls’ that included the ability to turn off Internet access for specific devices based on time. The ASUS RT-AC66U and the RT-N66U both had this feature. I decided to save $40 and go with the N version of the router since I do not own any AC devices.

The router makes use of a web interface for initial setup and making settings changes so there is no need for Windows. As an Ubuntu user I am always happy to see manufacturers that do not rely on special Windows only software for managing their devices. In this case there is one piece of software that is Windows only; the firmware recovery utility. Careful reading on the web indicates that the software does nothing more than setup a TFTP server for firmware recovery.

I am very pleased with the performance improvement of the router. I used Wifi Analyzer on my Nexus 7 to capture the signal strength comparison. For reference the green colored graph is the DIR-655 and the purple is the ASUS RT-N66U.


In the same room – 3 feet distance


One room away same level – 30 feet distance


Upstairs – 30 feet distance

With previous attempts to replace the DIR-655 I had problems such as wireless dropouts and lockups. The worse of the bunch was the Buffalo WZR-HP-G450H, but the Linksys line also failed. I can report that I am currently very happy with the ASUS RT-N66U.

This entry was posted in Linux, Ubuntu. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to ASUS RT-N66U

  1. Don’t know what you put on them. I have been using Garggoyle – like it a lot.
    But am having to dump my old wrt54GL’s as they are not big enough to run latest versions. Tomato doesn’t have the kid monitor functinality I want.
    Just bought a Netgear N600 WNDR6800 and will put latest stable Gargoyle on it in the next few days.

  2. Jorge Castro says:

    Are you using the stock ROM or something fancy? The stock firmware seemed decent enough for me to not bother flashing it. I have this router too and it’s awesome.

    • Charles Profitt says:

      Stock firmware currently. It seems to do everything I need.

      • fwiw, I tend to flash an oss solution as with manufacturer firmware, security vulnerabilities are often not disclosed and in older routers often not fixed even when disclosed.

        (eg How many manufacturers are fixing the upnp vulnerabiity, wherein routers can be reconfigured from the outside even if upnp webside is turned off?)

        When travelling, and connecting thru a router I can’t trust, will 100% use a vpn.

  3. Hey Charlie, I bought the same router last year when I started with canonical. I was generating too much traffic for my old Dlink. I ended up installing tomato so that I could use an old USB HDD as a NAS device. I also like the traffic shaping that I can do with it. I have media streaming also setup, but do not often use it. If you’re considering it, I’d recommend it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s